Adour
#121
Posted 17 May 2011 - 08:53 PM
#122
Posted 17 May 2011 - 09:05 PM
But to me, that is rapturous when done well—as difficult as that is.In a discussion of Lincoln, oakapple said that, at these prices, people expect rapture. If he thought about it, I think he'd see that isn't necessarily so. The food (and experience) at Adour isn't thrilling or challenging or anything else you'd expect would be necessary to invoke a rapturous response. It's comforting -- but at a very high level. I don't mean by that, that this is comfort food. Far from it. I just mean that it's an entrenched classical style, done exceedingly well. You'll never be blown away. But if you like that style, you'll love Adour.
Editor, New York Journal
#123
Posted 17 May 2011 - 09:36 PM
Uh, I think to make that official, you would have had to pay for my meal.Since rozrapp and Mr. rozrapp are a couple, I guess my date was u.e.
the ulterior epicure
#124
Posted 17 May 2011 - 09:45 PM
YOU DO NOT WANT HIM TO PAY FOR YOUR MEAL.Uh, I think to make that official, you would have had to pay for my meal.
Since rozrapp and Mr. rozrapp are a couple, I guess my date was u.e.
#125
Posted 17 May 2011 - 10:04 PM
the death of innocence...YOU DO NOT WANT HIM TO PAY FOR YOUR MEAL.
Uh, I think to make that official, you would have had to pay for my meal.
Since rozrapp and Mr. rozrapp are a couple, I guess my date was u.e.
“One thing kids like is to be tricked. For instance, I was going to take my little nephew to Disneyland, but instead I drove him to an old burned-out warehouse. 'Oh, no!', I said, 'Disneyland burned down.' He cried and cried, but I think that deep down he thought it was a pretty good joke. I started to drive over to the real Disneyland, but it was getting pretty late.”
~Jack Handey
*proud descendant of cheese eating surrender monkeys*
#126
Posted 17 May 2011 - 10:11 PM
Who said anything about WANTING him to pay for my meal? I'm just saying, in order for Sneakeater to have the privilege of saying he was my date, he would have had to have paid for my meal.YOU DO NOT WANT HIM TO PAY FOR YOUR MEAL.
Uh, I think to make that official, you would have had to pay for my meal.
Since rozrapp and Mr. rozrapp are a couple, I guess my date was u.e.
So, Sandro's almond souffle was a knock-out. The $38 glass of Meursault that our captain/server/wine person poured to pair for my main course of lobster, not so much, especially after I gave him a pretty direct message at the start of the meal that I was a lightweight and only wanted half-pours for each course. But, I guess I let it happen. The wine was a bit too alcoholic for the delicate flavor of the lobster dish, in my opinion. But then, what do I know about wine (only that I like to drink what I like to drink, and that a $38 glass of Meursault in this instance, was a little steep)? At the risk of starting a digression on the merits of union houses...
the ulterior epicure
#127
Posted 17 May 2011 - 10:25 PM
(Although $38 without telling you . . . .)
#128
Posted 17 May 2011 - 10:35 PM
Right, right, my objection was not with the wine (though I didn't think it paired particularly well).Yeah, who ever heard of Meursault and lobster? Guy went totally off the reservation there.
(Although $38 without telling you . . . .)
I'm not sure when he was supposed to tell me that the glass of wine was $38. I suppose I should have told him when he poured the rose for the first course that a full glass was no appropriate for the second. That, again, was my fault.
the ulterior epicure
#129
Posted 19 May 2011 - 03:55 PM
Having had the fortune of eating far more of it than most, I'd go with Chef Boyles at Per Se as a very strong and up and coming contender for the 2 spot (a spot that a year ago may have been occupied by The Modern).
I always thought the desserts at per se were weak. But I probably haven't eaten there in almost a year. Has anything changed?
#130
Posted 19 May 2011 - 04:14 PM
Having had the fortune of eating far more of it than most, I'd go with Chef Boyles at Per Se as a very strong and up and coming contender for the 2 spot (a spot that a year ago may have been occupied by The Modern).
I always thought the desserts at per se were weak. But I probably haven't eaten there in almost a year. Has anything changed?
I know Rouxel quit to move to Bouchon 2 years ago or so, and after that they were pretty weak during the transition. Better a year ago under the new head chef. And really good right now, but standard disclaimer that I get more dishes than most. Actually the salon menu has 2 really good things right now - artichoke agnolotti and the sour cherry dessert.
#131
Posted 02 August 2011 - 01:54 PM
#132
Posted 02 August 2011 - 03:40 PM
For the past decade I have not really been arms-length from Ducasse. In reporting on the original Essex House restaurant I spent a total of two weeks in the kitchen there, working closely with Didier Elena and most specifically with one of the line cooks Doug Psaltis. Doug's brother Michael later became (and still is) my literary agent.
See? Not so difficult, is it?
Why live your life when you could curate it?
At the Sign of the Pink Pig
#133
Posted 02 August 2011 - 03:42 PM
Yes, but do you really think he's only been comped 1/3 of the food?For the past decade I have not really been arms-length from Ducasse. In reporting on the original Essex House restaurant I spent a total of two weeks in the kitchen there, working closely with Didier Elena and most specifically with one of the line cooks Doug Psaltis. Doug's brother Michael later became (and still is) my literary agent.
See? Not so difficult, is it?
#134
Posted 02 August 2011 - 03:47 PM
Editor, New York Journal
#135
Posted 02 August 2011 - 04:04 PM
Yes, but do you really think he's only been comped 1/3 of the food?
For the past decade I have not really been arms-length from Ducasse. In reporting on the original Essex House restaurant I spent a total of two weeks in the kitchen there, working closely with Didier Elena and most specifically with one of the line cooks Doug Psaltis. Doug's brother Michael later became (and still is) my literary agent.
See? Not so difficult, is it?
Read carefully - 1/3 of the meals.












