Jump to content


The Pete Wells Thread

  • Please log in to reply
5162 replies to this topic

#5161 Sneakeater


    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 56,758 posts

Posted 22 March 2017 - 11:35 PM

"assume"  - Tony Randall explained it best.

OK, let me put it a different way:

If a reviewer has no credibility to begin with, then what difference do his review subject choices make?
Bar Loser

MF Old

#5162 small h

small h

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 221 posts

Posted 23 March 2017 - 01:20 AM

Maybe Pete Wells will review Hair of the Dog next.

That would be a sign of the apocalypse. It would mean there's nothing left to review.


When I first read your comment, I paused for a moment and considered that if someone were to do a round-up of restaurants that serve curly fries, Hair of the Dog could be part of that. Then I looked at the online menu. Hair of the Dog doesn't even serve curly fries. So it's completely useless.

#5163 Wilfrid


    Advanced Member

  • Admin
  • PipPipPip
  • 81,666 posts

Posted 23 March 2017 - 03:56 AM

Yeah! Like that dumb River Cafe piece! And Sammy's Shakedown!