I hope you did! My complaint is that it's not always fair to make a blanket statement about a specific dish; a few of us here think that dish is great, and have tasted great versions of it.
Well, yours wasn't done especially well...I've had that dish 3 or 4 times, and it has been good to excellent each of those times.
I bet I paid as much as you for it.
I try to cut a place some slack - I got a piece of shoe leather as smoked meat at Mile End once, and I was prepared to accept that it was a weird aberration. But I had difficulty imagining this dish being much more exciting than it was - although yes, it could have been better.
But then we get into a whole other set of what's fair in reviewing restaurants. And how objective can we actually be?