No Scent Restaurant How to enforce kindly
#1
Posted 08 March 2007 - 05:42 PM
When she returned to the reception area, she was sniffed by the restaurant owner and deemed still too scented. At this point, she encouraged the other three to stay for dinner. Two of the three, my parents, said in so many words amongst themselves, no fucking way. And they all decided to leave. My dad remarked to the owner, the sniffer in charge, that they would never return. That's when the owner started yelling at my dad that the restaurant employs a sensitively nosed person and yadda yadda yadda. The group leaves. The owner follows my dad (my soon to be 75 year old dad) into the parking lot and continues the yelling.
So.
Questions and comments to follow of course. One question that comes to my mind, is how does a sensitively nosed person work at all in a restaurant. One comment: in this era of internets and such, a restaurant owner needs to be careful who he/she yells at. Cause this stuff can spread around fast.
#2
Posted 08 March 2007 - 05:47 PM
Quote
Website
#3
Posted 08 March 2007 - 05:48 PM
Is Eric Stapleman the guy who did the chasing?
#4
Posted 08 March 2007 - 06:07 PM
Rail Paul, on Mar 8 2007, 12:47 PM, said:
Quote
Website
By sending the offending guest to the restroom, to wash/brush up under the eyes of a staff member?
Oh, and I notice there are flowers in the dining room, according to a picture on the Web site. So why no fragrance on people? Does not compute.
Not to excuse the owner's yelling, which is unconscionable, but: if the customers knew about the no-scent policy, why did she wear any?
"Butchering" is to "Breaking Down" as "Dining" is to "Taking In" -- mitchells, 12 August 2010
#5
Posted 08 March 2007 - 06:09 PM
chasing and yelling should not enter into it at any point.
if you have to sniff a person upclose to determine whether they're wearing too much scent, they're not
in that case, you have a sniffing fetish
ets: sending a worker to watch/aid removal of scent is beyond ridiculous and the first stage of ensuing harassement
#6
Posted 08 March 2007 - 06:09 PM
She said that, in some places, an employee who has a severe allergy could demand that a restaurant provide a reasonable accomodation for that allergy, including a fragrance-free or peanut-free etc workplace. Under federal laws and under some state laws, this demand could be enforceable with money penalties if the employee couldn't be accomodated with some reasonable work-around.
In a place like Santa Fe, with local employment laws, it's entirely possible the restaurant is trying to address a potentially serious complaint.
Insert the hypothetical, this isn't legal advice, etc disclaimer here.
#7
Posted 08 March 2007 - 06:10 PM
'Inflexible', or 'fascist'?
Although I could have used that restaurant owner on my flight to Saint Martin last week. The woman across the aisle from me kept spraying herself with some incredibly stinky stuff. I actually started to wheeze from it and the idiotic creature kept it up anyway.
------------------------------------------------------------
The mistake one makes is to react to what people post rather than to what they mean.---Dr. Johnson
-------------------------------------------------------------
I want to be the girl with the most cake.
#8
Posted 08 March 2007 - 07:07 PM
or, drag the owner into the restroom and give him a swirly.
James Bond, <i>Casino Royale</i>
#9
Posted 08 March 2007 - 07:17 PM
Ron Johnson, on Mar 8 2007, 11:07 AM, said:
or, drag the owner into the restroom and give him a swirly.
#10
Posted 08 March 2007 - 07:19 PM
#11
Posted 08 March 2007 - 07:21 PM
Photography is jazz for the eye. - William Claxton
#12
Posted 08 March 2007 - 07:25 PM
But this policy is beyond the pale of good manners; totally unacceptable.
As for liability to an eggshell skull employee...I need to be persuaded. Can restaurants really be shackled by one employee with an allergy to...soap, for example?
***Every Monday***At the Sign of the Pink Pig.
If the author could go around the place hitting random readers with a rubber hammer, the Pink Pig would still be worth a visit.
#13
Posted 08 March 2007 - 07:28 PM
Wilfrid, on Mar 8 2007, 02:25 PM, said:
nope.
James Bond, <i>Casino Royale</i>
#14
Posted 08 March 2007 - 07:29 PM
Scent free requirement due to actual allergies by an employee or due to prima donna attitude not to overpower the delicate aromas of the food? Giorgio parfums were banned from some restaurants years ago for the numbing of scent receptors. Pretty desperate Restaureur to follow ANY customers out the door, much less send someone into a lav with a customer. What planet are these people from?
#15
Posted 08 March 2007 - 07:31 PM
But as a policy, it's stupid. I doubt if I've attended a restaurant of any formality in the last ten years "scent free". I also doubt if I've offended anyone. Scent-wise, anyway. What's the deodorant policy? Do they have unscented soap in the washrooms?
***Every Monday***At the Sign of the Pink Pig.
If the author could go around the place hitting random readers with a rubber hammer, the Pink Pig would still be worth a visit.

Help

















