[CZ] Prague Notes
#16
Posted 25 August 2008 - 08:34 AM
Suppose someone opened a restaurant like this in Lower Manhattan, featuring traditional Czech cuisine lightened up and inflected with contemporary cooking techniques. They might decorate the dining room with murals in the style of Alfons Mucha, and maybe call the place "Moldau".
What would happen? A lot of people here would whine that they were misrepresenting -- "Frenchifying" -- a cuisine that doesn't need such tomfoolery, in order to make it more palatable to Americans. And just as I thought it was bullshit when people said that about Danube in New York City, I'd think it was bullshit here.
Surely, no one would lodge such a complaint against a restaurant like Le Degustation located in Prague. I would hope we'd agree that they can do whatever they want with their cuisine. But once you accept that, it shouldn't make any difference whether this is being done in Prague (or Vienna) or New York. It should only matter if it's good.
Also -- let's face it -- Central European cookery can use lightening up. Czech food (if not Viennese or Hungarian) is, not to put too fine a point to it, pretty boring. AND too heavy. A place like Le Degustation does just what's needed to suit it to contemporary tastes.
Moreover, if Central European cuisine is part of the European mainstream -- something its native proponents are very adamant about -- then there's no reason in the world it can't avail itself of contemporary European techniques.
It may seem like I'm setting up a straw man here. But if you read the "Danube" thread on the New York Board, you'll see what I'm talking about.
#17
Posted 25 August 2008 - 09:24 AM
Although Cerny Kohout ("Black Rooster" -- it's like that old Steve Martin riff about traveling in France: they have different words for everything) is now located fairly near the National Theater in the New Town, it started out in a suburb. I think that's an interesting fact, because what Cerny Kohout -- a mom-and-pop operation focusing on fresh seasonal ingredients and local produce, with a modest but quirky chef-driven menu -- most reminded me of is a New Brooklyn Restaurant.
Frankly, I think I blew this place by ordering wrong. I hewed to the more traditional Czech dishes, when to get the most out of this restaurant I think you have to go to the parts of the menu where the chef gives himself his head. Certainly, my lamb shank (the menu called it a "lamb knuckle") was as well prepared as any I've had, the outside crunchy and the inside meltingly tender. I shouldn't have let my native suspicion of the dread Fusion deter me from trying the dishes where the chef tries out French and Asian influences: I wouldn't avoid them in Brooklyn, and it was patronizing to avoid them here.
But remember what this place is. It's like the New Brooklyn: what you get won't be impeccably conceived and slickly executed; rather, it will be sort of funky, untutored, and, you hope, soulful.
Visitors should learn from my mistake.
#18
Posted 25 August 2008 - 02:55 PM
Sneak, you know of what you speak!
Flipping through Vaříme zdravě, chutně a hospodárně, sort of like the Czech Joy of Cooking (published in English the 1960s as "The Czechoslovak Cookbook"), I'm hard-pressed to find many dishes that really appeal. Many are stultifyingly plain (a recipe for "Ovar" consists of pork jowl, tongue and heart, boiled in salted water, served with "optional" horseradish or mustard; the Roast Pork Loin and Roast Goose recipes have no other ingredients save for salt and caraway seeds; Radish Salad is radishes, lemon juice, sugar and oil; etc.); others would seem to have limited appeal nowadays (brain pancakes, jellied brawn, creamed tripe).
Milan's, the kitschy Slovak restaurant in Brooklyn, was never very good the few times I tried it -- salty, heavy and stodgy. I for one would prefer a "Frenchified" place like Vienna '79, Peter Grunauer's "neue" take on Austrian food that Mimi Sheraton awarded 4 stars to back in 1981, noting approvingly,
I wish it, or something like it, were still around here in NY. Austrian-German cooking can be a thing of beauty; two of the most wonderful meals I had in recent memory were at the Michelin-starred 'Caroussel' restaurant at the Relais & Châteaux Hotel Bülow Residenz in Dresden, and the rustic Hans-Thoma-Stube ("Schwarzwälder Behaglichkeit und regionale Spezialitäten") in the excellent Columbi Hotel in Freiburg-im-Breisgau. I hit the latter one in springtime and had the Spargelkarte, which was truly outstanding.
Shall bloom a thousand blooms
Of happiness and dreams come true,
In a thousand concrete rooms!"
#19
Posted 25 August 2008 - 03:35 PM
My opinions are obviously my personal opinions. Not yours. Not universal.
#20
Posted 25 August 2008 - 05:51 PM
I know that these days we're supposed to say that everybody is special in his or her own special way. But let's be honest: Slavic food isn't as good as Austro-German or Magyar food (much less French or Italian). So the old truism remains true: there are lots of good reasons to go to Prague -- but (Le Degustation excepted) food isn't one of them.
Beer is. Now that I've been, I'd put it this way. Take however good you'd expect Czech beer to be, based on things you've read and exports you've drunk. Then, multiply it by ten.
That's how good Czech beer is in the Czech Republic.
#21
Posted 25 August 2008 - 08:59 PM
I share your sentiments toward Czech food...but I think that about Eastern/Central European food in general.
My opinions are obviously my personal opinions. Not yours. Not universal.
#22
Posted 25 August 2008 - 10:35 PM
I don't know if you're counting Austria in Central Europe (not only is Vienna the classic Central European city, but it's farther east than Prague, as people in Prague never tire of telling you), but Viennese food is like on another planet from Czech food.
#23
Posted 25 August 2008 - 10:54 PM
Hungarian food is also kind of wet. But I liked it more. That was where I started eating spaetzle
#24
Posted 25 August 2008 - 11:01 PM
purdah nahin jab koi khuda se, bandon se purdah karna kya?
~shaqeel badayuni
if it takes us seven years to prepare for a madness, how long shall it take us to run naked into the marketplace?
~yoruba proverb
facts are meaningless. you could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!
~homer simpson
maybe it wasn't the best wording.
~nathan
#25
Posted 25 August 2008 - 11:13 PM
My opinions are obviously my personal opinions. Not yours. Not universal.
#27
Posted 26 August 2008 - 11:42 AM
#28
Posted 26 August 2008 - 12:32 PM
#29
Posted 02 September 2008 - 03:11 PM
So I went to see the great revival of A Walk Worth Taking -- a 60s pop opera originally put on at the famous alternative theater the Semafor -- at the National Theater. (It's such a huge hit it's still playing more than a year after it's debut in the stagione here. They should tour it.) This presented an opportunity to revisit Cerny Kohout, and to try to rectify my previous ordering mistake.
I opened this time with a salmon pate with crabmeat, served alongside a cod liver emulsion (yes: they are making food out of the most famously distateful item in world gastronomy!). This seemed as far away from traditional Czech cuisine as possible, since only William Shakespeare and possibly OTB would think a fish like salmon would be native to the Czech Republic. It was a good dish (don't tell my mother, but I loved that cod liver emulsion!). But still in the rather amateurish, unslick, "New Brooklyn" style I had noted in my first visit.
Then, on to something described as larded carp. (Carp, unlike salmon, is WAY native here.) As far as I can tell, larded meant rolled with slices of Prague Ham. Since you can barely get a piece of fish that isn't served with a pork product in New York these days, I felt right at home. Another good dish, also in the unslick, slightly amateurish style.
I guess I think this is a good place -- I'd be happy to return yet again -- but not great. Again like the "New Brooklyn" restaurants, if it were somewhere else, with a lot of better restaurants, people wouldn't get as excited about it.
#30
Posted 02 September 2008 - 05:29 PM
So I went to see the great revival of A Walk Worth Taking -- a 60s pop opera originally put on at the famous alternative theater the Semafor -- at the National Theater. (It's such a huge hit it's still playing more than a year after it's debut in the stagione here. They should tour it.) This presented an opportunity to revisit Cerny Kohout, and to try to rectify my previous ordering mistake.
I opened this time with a salmon pate with crabmeat, served alongside a cod liver emulsion (yes: they are making food out of the most famously distateful item in world gastronomy!). This seemed as far away from traditional Czech cuisine as possible, since only William Shakespeare and possibly OTB would think a fish like salmon would be native to the Czech Republic. It was a good dish (don't tell my mother, but I loved that cod liver emulsion!). But still in the rather amateurish, unslick, "New Brooklyn" style I had noted in my first visit.
Then, on to something described as larded carp. (Carp, unlike salmon, is WAY native here.) As far as I can tell, larded meant rolled with slices of Prague Ham. Since you can barely get a piece of fish that isn't served with a pork product in New York these days, I felt right at home. Another good dish, also in the unslick, slightly amateurish style.
I guess I think this is a good place -- I'd be happy to return yet again -- but not great. Again like the "New Brooklyn" restaurants, if it were somewhere else, with a lot of better restaurants, people wouldn't get as excited about it.
Are you home yet?













