Mouthfuls: cool couples - Mouthfuls

Jump to content

Help

(10 Pages)
« First
←
4
5
6
7
8
→
Last »

You cannot start a new topic
You cannot reply to this topic

cool couples

#76 hollywood

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 19,027
Joined: 31-March 04

Posted 11 June 2009 - 06:18 PM

To get back on topic.... For a brief period: Chrissie Hynde and Ray Davies.

Paul Krugman channeling Robert Palmer: You might as well face it: they’re addicted to Bush.

#77 JPW

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,221
Joined: 18-January 05

Posted 11 June 2009 - 06:18 PM

QUOTE(porkwah @ Jun 11 2009, 02:17 PM)

Salman Rushdie & Padma Lakshmi

Seal and Heidi Klum

"You know what we need around here? More guidelines. I don't think we have enough guidelines. I mean -- look at that other place, it even has guidelines for its guidelines."

"Also, we don't "ban" people in the arbitrary fashion you are describing. It's a meticulous and careful process, which is only used sparingly." -jhlurie (now ex-officio)

#78 KRamsey

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,652
Joined: 03-August 04

Posted 11 June 2009 - 06:25 PM

QUOTE(Behemoth @ Jun 9 2009, 03:42 PM)

QUOTE(mongo_jones @ Jun 11 2009, 06:11 PM)

as i took in the somewhat strange spectacle of sonic youth on letterman last night i was reminded of a conversation i had in grad school with an ultra-cool older student (who i've since lamentably lost all contact with). laurie anderson had just performed at usc and she (my friend, not laurie anderson) opined that there could not possibly be a cooler couple than laurie anderson and lou reed. i thought john and yoko trump them, but, of course, only one of them is still alive. kim gordon and thurston moore must be up there in the pantheon, however. extending out of music, bogart and bacall are near the top. perce and mary shelley probably top the literary list.

Patti and Fred (Sonic) Smith.

Jackson Smith (Patti and Fred's son) and Meg White.

It's fucking low-fat cheese. Focus on it. --A. Bonner

#79 porkwah

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 3,980
Joined: 25-July 04

Posted 11 June 2009 - 06:26 PM

Serge Gainsbourg and Brigitte Bardot

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

"have to POKE OUT that b" -- cutlet, after learning how the word "climb" is spelled

#80 Rich

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 4,177
Joined: 22-June 04

Posted 11 June 2009 - 06:29 PM

peas & carrots

#81 Stone

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 9,334
Joined: 23-March 04

Posted 11 June 2009 - 06:58 PM

How could Mongo forget: Number 1 & Number 2.

I said "yeah, yeah, yeah, whoo."

#82 Rich

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 4,177
Joined: 22-June 04

Posted 11 June 2009 - 07:12 PM

QUOTE(Stone @ Jun 11 2009, 02:58 PM)

How could Mongo forget: Number 1 & Number 2.

One is the lonliest number and two can be as sad as one - it's the lonliest number since the number one.

#83 Squeat Mungry

Advanced Member

Group: Admin
Posts: 6,068
Joined: 13-December 04

Posted 11 June 2009 - 07:34 PM

Laurie Anderson and Lou Reed.

Seriously, Georgia O'Keeffe and Alfred Stieglitz.

I hadn't the heart to touch my breakfast. I told Jeeves to drink it himself. -- P.G. Wodehouse

#84 Rich

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 4,177
Joined: 22-June 04

Posted 11 June 2009 - 07:42 PM

QUOTE(JPW @ Jun 11 2009, 02:18 PM)

QUOTE(porkwah @ Jun 11 2009, 02:17 PM)

Salman Rushdie & Padma Lakshmi

Seal and Heidi Klum

Just like Bread & Butter.

#85 ghostrider

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 6,022
Joined: 23-April 05

Posted 11 June 2009 - 07:50 PM

QUOTE(porkwah @ Jun 11 2009, 02:26 PM)

Serge Gainsbourg and Brigitte Bardot

I was gonna say Bardot & Vadim. I guess that dates me.

Dali & Gala. (Tho Ernst & Gala may have been even more cool.)

And of course Squeat & Splinky.

It was hard to avoid the feeling that somebody, somewhere, was missing the point. I couldn't even be sure that it wasn't me. - Douglas Adams

Please come visit my new blog and be Tantalized.

#86 splinky

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 12,282
Joined: 04-August 07

Posted 11 June 2009 - 07:57 PM

seven eight nine. okay, it was a threesome, but the kink was cool

"The fact is I don't know what'll become of us.
Here it is the middle of August and the coldest day of the year. It's simply freezing; the dogs are sticking to the sidewalks; can anybody explain that? No.
But I'm not surprised. The whole world's at sixes and sevens, and why the house hasn't fallen down about our ears long ago is a miracle to me."
~Thornton Wilder

"Now ladies don't be mad at me, I'm only callin' ya bitches 'cause I don't know your names, individually." ~ Katt Williams

proud descendant of cheese-eating surrender monkeys

#87 Squeat Mungry

Advanced Member

Group: Admin
Posts: 6,068
Joined: 13-December 04

Posted 11 June 2009 - 07:59 PM

QUOTE(ghostrider @ Jun 11 2009, 12:50 PM)

And of course Squeat & Splinky.

Of course.

Also: Alma Mahler Gropius Werfel and just about anybody.

I hadn't the heart to touch my breakfast. I told Jeeves to drink it himself. -- P.G. Wodehouse

#88 Behemoth

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 5,500
Joined: 30-May 05

Posted 11 June 2009 - 08:01 PM

Rebecca West and H.G. Wells.

Summarizing, then, we assume that relational information is not subject to a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test.
-Chomskybot

#89 LML

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 1,181
Joined: 20-March 04

Posted 11 June 2009 - 08:03 PM

Rod Hull & Emu.

I'll make life real easy for him and be signing off for three months effective the first of the year.

We've just removed several inappropriate comments from this Q&A. Going forward, those who think so highly of their own culinary prowess that they feel they have nothing to learn here should either 1) volunteer to teach an eGCI class, or 2) stay out of the eGCI altogether. Contentious posts and attempts to hijack this learning process will be removed as will their authors. Anyone who lacks the common sense to know what is and isn't appropriate in the current setting should err on the side of caution and say nothing. Thanks.

They Invoke Formal Academic Arguments Like the Intentionist Fallacy or the Logical Fallacy

“We would like the kitchen to cook for us.” That is the secret handshake used in the dining community to communicate to a chef or kitchen that you are serious about dining out and that you want to be accorded whatever special treatment the restaurant holds in reserve for regulars and other serious diners.