Saxon + Parole
#1
Posted 21 November 2011 - 10:05 PM
All I have to say is that my entirely inconclusive review of the place is at the .Pink Pig.
The truth is, S+P gallops off in so many different directions (steakhouse, seafood restaurant, American bistro) that one hardly knows how throw a rope around it. After my first dinner there, I convinced myself I needed to go back and eat a different way.
While I was sitting on this plan, other meals needing a review piled up, and I finally resolved to get it out there for what it's worth. I don't even blame the restaurant - Balthazar has a menu of similar scope. What I blame is having neither the time nor the expense account to visit every place two or three times.
Why live your life when you could curate it?
At the Sign of the Pink Pig
#2
Posted 21 November 2011 - 10:19 PM
------------------------------------------------------------
The mistake one makes is to react to what people post rather than to what they mean.---Dr. Johnson
-------------------------------------------------------------
I want to be the girl with the most cake.
#3
Posted 04 December 2011 - 03:52 PM
#4
Posted 04 December 2011 - 06:09 PM
#5
Posted 04 December 2011 - 06:48 PM
Ha! I welcome the levity. Thanks.You should have tried their hamburger. It has an egg on it.
#6
Posted 15 February 2012 - 04:47 PM
... just another $16 glass of red at a crowded New York hotspot. Such a transactional style of delivery one might expect from the UPS man, not at a restaurant charging $22 for an Archipel cabernet sauvignon or $25 for a flute of Ayala Brut Majeur.
..On arriving, some guests are offered coat check. Others aren’t. When your table is ready, about 15 minutes past the reservation time, you vie to flag down the bartender, because the host won’t transfer any checks.
Worth a read.
Why live your life when you could curate it?
At the Sign of the Pink Pig
#7
Posted 15 February 2012 - 04:54 PM
Why live your life when you could curate it?
At the Sign of the Pink Pig
#8
Posted 15 February 2012 - 05:02 PM
And so would I. Honestly, the enthusiasm for Brad Farmerie is somewhat beyond me. I've paid five visits to his various places and really liked only one (Monday Room).If it has to be one or the other, I'd choose Danny Meyer-style manic enthusiasm any day of the week.
Editor, New York Journal
#9
Posted 15 February 2012 - 05:02 PM
$25 for a glass of Ayala.
I hope it comes with some lubricant.
#10
Posted 15 February 2012 - 05:19 PM
#11
Posted 15 February 2012 - 05:37 PM
#12
Posted 15 February 2012 - 05:53 PM
Sometimes, when the prices are way out of line (as he seemed to believe here), it is the best way of explaining precisely what is wrong with the restaurant. Most people these days expect a restaurant critic to address whether the restaurant offers good value for the money, and not merely whether it is good in the absolute sense.i have to admit, i find the obsessive recounting of price in the review to be a little gauche and unseemly.
Editor, New York Journal
#13
Posted 15 February 2012 - 05:55 PM
Everything is always OK in the end. If it's not OK, then it's not the end.
#14
Posted 15 February 2012 - 05:56 PM
Sometimes, when the prices are way out of line (as he seemed to believe here), it is the best way of explaining precisely what is wrong with the restaurant. Most people these days expect a restaurant critic to address whether the restaurant offers good value for the money, and not merely whether it is good in the absolute sense.
i have to admit, i find the obsessive recounting of price in the review to be a little gauche and unseemly.
Price can be a signifier of more than value as well. Huge markups can say much about the type of crowd the restaurant hopes to attract, which can sometimes say things about the seriousness of the food. Bottle service being the most obvious example.
#15
Posted 15 February 2012 - 05:59 PM
Sometimes, when the prices are way out of line (as he seemed to believe here), it is the best way of explaining precisely what is wrong with the restaurant. Most people these days expect a restaurant critic to address whether the restaurant offers good value for the money, and not merely whether it is good in the absolute sense.
i have to admit, i find the obsessive recounting of price in the review to be a little gauche and unseemly.
the point can be made in a short analytical graf, substantiated with representative figures. it does not need to be made by obsessively annotating the piece. it is essentially a rhetorical choice, one that i find both unpersuasive and off-putting.
furthermore, i always assume that restaurants do not offer good value unless that is explicitly articulated. good value is relative too. for instance, it is idiotic, value-wise for me to ever drink wine at a restaurant instead of buying wine myself. not the case for most on this board.












