Jump to content


Photo

"24/192 music downloads and why they make no sense"


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 mongo_jones

mongo_jones

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 21,728 posts

Posted 06 March 2012 - 04:27 PM

linky

Articles last month revealed that musician Neil Young and Apple's Steve Jobs discussed offering digital music downloads of 'uncompromised studio quality'. Much of the press and user commentary was particularly enthusiastic about the prospect of uncompressed 24 bit 192kHz downloads. 24/192 featured prominently in my own conversations with Mr. Young's group several months ago.

Unfortunately, there is no point to distributing music in 24-bit/192kHz format. Its playback fidelity is slightly inferior to 16/44.1 or 16/48, and it takes up 6 times the space.

There are a few real problems with the audio quality and 'experience' of digitally distributed music today. 24/192 solves none of them. While everyone fixates on 24/192 as a magic bullet, we're not going to see any actual improvement.

First, the bad news

In the past few weeks, I've had conversations with intelligent, scientifically minded individuals who believe in 24/192 downloads and want to know how anyone could possibly disagree. They asked good questions that deserve detailed answers.

I was also interested in what motivated high-rate digital audio advocacy. Responses indicate that few people understand basic signal theory or the sampling theorem, which is hardly surprising. Misunderstandings of the mathematics, technology, and physiology arose in most of the conversations, often asserted by professionals who otherwise possessed significant audio expertise. Some even argued that the sampling theorem doesn't really explain how digital audio actually works [1].

Misinformation and superstition only serve charlatans. So, let's cover some of the basics of why 24/192 distribution makes no sense before suggesting some improvements that actually do.


my annoying opinions: whisky, food and occasional cultural commentary (current review: the hmongtown marketplace food court, st. paul)

 

facts are meaningless. you could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!
~homer simpson


 


#2 Orik

Orik

    Advanced Member

  • Technocrat
  • PipPipPip
  • 17,366 posts

Posted 06 March 2012 - 05:00 PM

It is unfortunate that people with a science and engineering background often fail to grasp how marketing works and end up wasting precious time trying to convey facts to the public.

sandwiches that are large and filling and do not contain tuna or prawns


#3 SLBunge

SLBunge

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,063 posts

Posted 06 March 2012 - 07:36 PM

Good read. But what will I do with the 3TB of storage that I bought?
Suffocating under a pile of cheese curds.

#4 mongo_jones

mongo_jones

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 21,728 posts

Posted 06 March 2012 - 07:44 PM

you could use it to store all that porn in your garage.

my annoying opinions: whisky, food and occasional cultural commentary (current review: the hmongtown marketplace food court, st. paul)

 

facts are meaningless. you could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!
~homer simpson


 


#5 SLBunge

SLBunge

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,063 posts

Posted 06 March 2012 - 08:06 PM

Then what will I store in my garage?
Suffocating under a pile of cheese curds.

#6 Lex

Lex

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 19,029 posts

Posted 06 March 2012 - 08:07 PM

Then what will I store in my garage?

Body parts.

“I have a dream of a multiplicity of pastramis.”

"One of the Evil Twin beers I tried smelled like a foot." - LiquidNY

"I don't have time to point out all the ways in which you're wrong" - irnscrabblechf52