Ray Bradbury
#1
Posted 06 June 2012 - 03:09 PM
#2
Posted 06 June 2012 - 03:14 PM
Everything is always OK in the end. If it's not OK, then it's not the end.
#3
Posted 06 June 2012 - 03:20 PM
#4
Posted 06 June 2012 - 03:21 PM
I just like that TV commercial.
#5
Posted 06 June 2012 - 03:34 PM
Everything is always OK in the end. If it's not OK, then it's not the end.
#6
Posted 06 June 2012 - 03:57 PM
Looking over his Wikipedia entries I'm struck by how remarkably successful he was. Novels, short stories (Bradbury was much more a short story writer than a novelist), film, TV, and stage adaptations. Ray didn't labor in obscurity. He was a star.
A fun fact - Ray Bradbury was a lifelong friend of Ray Harryhausen, the great stop motion animator. They met in high school.
"None of you get it." - Wilfrid (on the Beatles)
"I don't have time to point out all the ways in which you're wrong" - irnscrabblechf52
#7
Posted 06 June 2012 - 05:01 PM
I couldn't have said it better. I devoured his stuff in the 50s & 60s. Such a talent. Wasn't one of his stories responsible for the phrase "Butterfly Effect"? RIP.I really liked his work, but then, I've been a science fiction fan since I was 12. At the time he was sui generis - "soft" science fiction was an anomaly in the 1950s. (It became much more popular later - Ursula LeGuin and Octavia Butler are examples.) He was also a supple and atmospheric writer, something that's extremely unusual in sci-fi where most authors view their prose as delivery vans for their ideas.
Please come visit my rock concert blog: Tantalized.
#8
Posted 06 June 2012 - 06:29 PM
He seemed to inspire people like Judith Merrill (The Year's Best SF) to cast a wide net in making selections. I see him and Vonnegut in another camp from scribes like Heinlein.I really liked his work, but then, I've been a science fiction fan since I was 12. At the time he was sui generis - "soft" science fiction was an anomaly in the 1950s. (It became much more popular later - Ursula LeGuin and Octavia Butler are examples.) He was also a supple and atmospheric writer, something that's extremely unusual in sci-fi where most authors view their prose as delivery vans for their ideas.
Someone is apparently planning a remake of Fahrenheit 451.
Monty Burns
#9
Posted 06 June 2012 - 06:49 PM
[M]ost of the pastas hover around $25. This ought to be enough to buy bucatini that is cooked on both ends. -- Pete Wells on Caravaggio ( * review)
Tonight, there was a dessert of coconut, rhubarb, and black olive. Obvious in its execution how innovation and experiment, when introduced for their own sake, are annoying. --irnscrabblechf52, May 9, 2013
notorious stickler -- NY Times
deeply annoying and nitpicking -- Molly O'Neill, One Big Table
#10
Posted 06 June 2012 - 07:50 PM
and this minor classic
When you think of some of his short stories and novels--"Something Wicked..." comes to mind; he was far less of a SF writer and far more of idea writer. "The Pedestrian" anyone?
#11
Posted 06 June 2012 - 07:53 PM
I went through a brief sci fi period in my youth: EE Doc Smith, Asimov, Michael Moorcock. It never really took hold.
Why live your life when you could curate it?
At the Sign of the Pink Pig
#12
Posted 06 June 2012 - 07:59 PM
I think the only Bradbury I've ever read was that short piece in last week's New Yorker.I am surprised to say I don't think I've ever read him.
Take me home.
#13
Posted 06 June 2012 - 10:20 PM
#14
Posted 06 June 2012 - 11:04 PM
I assumed he was a prolific novelist, but not at all. I am surprised to say I don't think I've ever read him.
I went through a brief sci fi period in my youth: EE Doc Smith, Asimov, Michael Moorcock. It never really took hold.
Not really like those SF and fantasy guys and not a very prolific novelist. Lots of short stories. The Chronicles and Illustrated Man were essentially a series of loosely connected short stories. Interesting and atmospheric. Fantastic but not fantasy. J.G. Ballard's; "The Drowned Giant" comes to mind for some reason. A little Cordwainer Smith and Peter Straub also, IMO. Although Bradbury was a pretty singular writer. Hard to pigeonhole or compare. Not the type you would find in Amazing, Analog or Galaxy ('60s pulps). He published a lot in Collier's back in the '50s.
#15
Posted 07 June 2012 - 12:54 AM












