Jump to content


Photo

Fuck the Nostalgists


  • Please log in to reply
94 replies to this topic

#16 Anthony Bonner

Anthony Bonner

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 7,079 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:17 PM

everything has a price that equals its value. sometimes that price is 0

also I've been saying this about the nostalgists for years
Why not mayo?

#17 Stone

Stone

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 13,293 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:28 PM

(OTOH, I think Americans have become hooked on too-cheap food just like they're hooked on too-cheap gas.)

How mighty upper-middle-class of you.

#18 Sneakeater

Sneakeater

    Advanced Member

  • Admin
  • PipPipPip
  • 30,299 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:28 PM

To the extent this affects poor people, it's another way they screwed by the rich.
Bar Loser

#19 Sneakeater

Sneakeater

    Advanced Member

  • Admin
  • PipPipPip
  • 30,299 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:30 PM

To the extent it affects the middle class, it's another example of how THEY'RE being screwed.

There is NO EXCUSE for the places my brother and his family eat out in in the suburbs. None.
Bar Loser

#20 Stone

Stone

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 13,293 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:35 PM

We're talking about inexpensive downtown deli lunchcounters, not bad suburban restaurants. A whole lot of people work downtown, supporting the lawyers, bankers and bureaucrats who don't have extra money to spend on lunch if they don't have to. (And they may think the food is fine, if not good.) Now, you're gentrified Manhattan has already forced them to leave the island because they can no longer afford rent. I guess it isn't too much to ask that they also brown-bag it so that you don't have to be offended by their crappy restaurants.

#21 Suzanne F

Suzanne F

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 14,104 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:40 PM

Not that anyone cares, but John Street is being torn up for the same reason that Fulton and Nassau and Chambers Streets are/have been torn up: fixing the infrastructure.

FWIW, I've never eaten at Roxy. Why would I? For that matter, haven't been back to Eisenberg's in many years, if you want to compare ancient places of similar aspect.

[M]ost of the pastas hover around $25. This ought to be enough to buy bucatini that is cooked on both ends. -- Pete Wells on Caravaggio ( * review)

 

Tonight, there was a dessert of coconut, rhubarb, and black olive. Obvious in its execution how innovation and experiment, when introduced for their own sake, are annoying. --irnscrabblechf52, May 9, 2013

 

notorious stickler -- NY Times
deeply annoying and nitpicking -- Molly O'Neill, One Big Table


#22 Sneakeater

Sneakeater

    Advanced Member

  • Admin
  • PipPipPip
  • 30,299 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:41 PM

We're talking about inexpensive downtown deli lunchcounters, not bad suburban restaurants. A whole lot of people work downtown, supporting the lawyers, bankers and bureaucrats who don't have extra money to spend on lunch if they don't have to. (And they may think the food is fine, if not good.) Now, you're gentrified Manhattan has already forced them to leave the island because they can no longer afford rent. I guess it isn't too much to ask that they also brown-bag it so that you don't have to be offended by their crappy restaurants.


So you're saying shovel those people shit because they're poor? That's great.

(Not that it seemed to me that anyone actually impecunious was among the few people at the Roxy today.)
Bar Loser

#23 Anthony Bonner

Anthony Bonner

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 7,079 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:42 PM

We're talking about inexpensive downtown deli lunchcounters, not bad suburban restaurants. A whole lot of people work downtown, supporting the lawyers, bankers and bureaucrats who don't have extra money to spend on lunch if they don't have to. (And they may think the food is fine, if not good.) Now, you're gentrified Manhattan has already forced them to leave the island because they can no longer afford rent. I guess it isn't too much to ask that they also brown-bag it so that you don't have to be offended by their crappy restaurants.

Sneak - how crowded was it. If Stone's right the place should be heaving.
Why not mayo?

#24 Sneakeater

Sneakeater

    Advanced Member

  • Admin
  • PipPipPip
  • 30,299 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:43 PM

Nearly empty.
Bar Loser

#25 Anthony Bonner

Anthony Bonner

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 7,079 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:44 PM

Nearly empty.

aand there's you're answer.
Why not mayo?

#26 Stone

Stone

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 13,293 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:44 PM

No, I'm saying maintain the restaurants they can afford to eat at.* Unless you want to further redistribute the wealth in our society so that everyone can afford an $18 pastrami sandwich & fries for lunch. Good luck, Comrade.

As Suzzane (and you) pointed out, the restaurant is not closing because it can't compete or even because it can't keep up with increased rents. Obviously, there are people who choose to eat their over other options in the neighborhood.

*I also think there is value/utility in diverse neighborhoods.

#27 AaronS

AaronS

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,480 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:46 PM

All the more reason to mock it.

I don't know. cynicism is a lot more palatable than idiocy, at least to me. how excited would you be to find out that the mast brothers really love techno and only wear ed hardy when they're on their own time? it would definitely make them my favorite brand.

#28 Wilfrid

Wilfrid

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 59,852 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:49 PM


All the more reason to mock it.

I don't know. cynicism is a lot more palatable than idiocy, at least to me. how excited would you be to find out that the mast brothers really love techno and only wear ed hardy when they're on their own time? it would definitely make them my favorite brand.


The examples I have in mind I'd want to mock whether they were cynical or sincere. A random example, this bleating about "honoring the whole animal." It's a crock, whether it's heartfelt or PR waffle.

Why live your life when you could curate it?

At the Sign of the Pink Pig


#29 Sneakeater

Sneakeater

    Advanced Member

  • Admin
  • PipPipPip
  • 30,299 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:50 PM

The whole corpse, you mean.
Bar Loser

#30 Sneakeater

Sneakeater

    Advanced Member

  • Admin
  • PipPipPip
  • 30,299 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 09:01 PM

No, I'm saying maintain the restaurants they can afford to eat at.* Unless you want to further redistribute the wealth in our society so that everyone can afford an $18 pastrami sandwich & fries for lunch. Good luck, Comrade.

As Suzzane (and you) pointed out, the restaurant is not closing because it can't compete or even because it can't keep up with increased rents. Obviously, there are people who choose to eat their over other options in the neighborhood.

*I also think there is value/utility in diverse neighborhoods.


I tend to think more like a rising tide lifts all boats.

Don't you think a better U.S. food culture would tend to bring the bottom up with it?

ETA -- But you're the one who said I shouldn't complain, with respect to THIS restaurant, that Americans are hooked on too-cheap food. Middle-class Americans are (just like gas). THIS isn't a place trying to feed people who can't afford to eat elsewhere (it isn't even that cheap). THIS is a place that's just bad. That's failing on its own terms. AND YET whose closing the nostalgists are already prospectively bemoaning.
Bar Loser