Fuck the Nostalgists
#16
Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:17 PM
also I've been saying this about the nostalgists for years
#17
Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:28 PM
How mighty upper-middle-class of you.(OTOH, I think Americans have become hooked on too-cheap food just like they're hooked on too-cheap gas.)
#18
Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:28 PM
#19
Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:30 PM
There is NO EXCUSE for the places my brother and his family eat out in in the suburbs. None.
#20
Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:35 PM
#21
Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:40 PM
FWIW, I've never eaten at Roxy. Why would I? For that matter, haven't been back to Eisenberg's in many years, if you want to compare ancient places of similar aspect.
[M]ost of the pastas hover around $25. This ought to be enough to buy bucatini that is cooked on both ends. -- Pete Wells on Caravaggio ( * review)
Tonight, there was a dessert of coconut, rhubarb, and black olive. Obvious in its execution how innovation and experiment, when introduced for their own sake, are annoying. --irnscrabblechf52, May 9, 2013
notorious stickler -- NY Times
deeply annoying and nitpicking -- Molly O'Neill, One Big Table
#22
Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:41 PM
We're talking about inexpensive downtown deli lunchcounters, not bad suburban restaurants. A whole lot of people work downtown, supporting the lawyers, bankers and bureaucrats who don't have extra money to spend on lunch if they don't have to. (And they may think the food is fine, if not good.) Now, you're gentrified Manhattan has already forced them to leave the island because they can no longer afford rent. I guess it isn't too much to ask that they also brown-bag it so that you don't have to be offended by their crappy restaurants.
So you're saying shovel those people shit because they're poor? That's great.
(Not that it seemed to me that anyone actually impecunious was among the few people at the Roxy today.)
#23
Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:42 PM
Sneak - how crowded was it. If Stone's right the place should be heaving.We're talking about inexpensive downtown deli lunchcounters, not bad suburban restaurants. A whole lot of people work downtown, supporting the lawyers, bankers and bureaucrats who don't have extra money to spend on lunch if they don't have to. (And they may think the food is fine, if not good.) Now, you're gentrified Manhattan has already forced them to leave the island because they can no longer afford rent. I guess it isn't too much to ask that they also brown-bag it so that you don't have to be offended by their crappy restaurants.
#24
Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:43 PM
#25
Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:44 PM
aand there's you're answer.Nearly empty.
#26
Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:44 PM
As Suzzane (and you) pointed out, the restaurant is not closing because it can't compete or even because it can't keep up with increased rents. Obviously, there are people who choose to eat their over other options in the neighborhood.
*I also think there is value/utility in diverse neighborhoods.
#27
Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:46 PM
I don't know. cynicism is a lot more palatable than idiocy, at least to me. how excited would you be to find out that the mast brothers really love techno and only wear ed hardy when they're on their own time? it would definitely make them my favorite brand.All the more reason to mock it.
#28
Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:49 PM
I don't know. cynicism is a lot more palatable than idiocy, at least to me. how excited would you be to find out that the mast brothers really love techno and only wear ed hardy when they're on their own time? it would definitely make them my favorite brand.
All the more reason to mock it.
The examples I have in mind I'd want to mock whether they were cynical or sincere. A random example, this bleating about "honoring the whole animal." It's a crock, whether it's heartfelt or PR waffle.
Why live your life when you could curate it?
At the Sign of the Pink Pig
#29
Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:50 PM
#30
Posted 27 June 2012 - 09:01 PM
No, I'm saying maintain the restaurants they can afford to eat at.* Unless you want to further redistribute the wealth in our society so that everyone can afford an $18 pastrami sandwich & fries for lunch. Good luck, Comrade.
As Suzzane (and you) pointed out, the restaurant is not closing because it can't compete or even because it can't keep up with increased rents. Obviously, there are people who choose to eat their over other options in the neighborhood.
*I also think there is value/utility in diverse neighborhoods.
I tend to think more like a rising tide lifts all boats.
Don't you think a better U.S. food culture would tend to bring the bottom up with it?
ETA -- But you're the one who said I shouldn't complain, with respect to THIS restaurant, that Americans are hooked on too-cheap food. Middle-class Americans are (just like gas). THIS isn't a place trying to feed people who can't afford to eat elsewhere (it isn't even that cheap). THIS is a place that's just bad. That's failing on its own terms. AND YET whose closing the nostalgists are already prospectively bemoaning.












