Jump to content


Photo

County of origin meat labels to be stopped?


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Rail Paul

Rail Paul

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 17,547 posts

Posted 04 July 2012 - 09:31 PM

NPR.org reports that the World Trade Organization has agreed with complaints from Mexico and Canada that US requirements for "county of origin" labels on meat are discriminatory. The two countries had raised the issue, contending the labels caused customers to shun imported meat.


Of-Origin Labels on Meat

10:30 am

July 3, 2012

Twitter (11)
Facebook (156)
E-mail
Share
Print
Comments (56)
Recommend (13)



by Dan Charles
Do you know where your beef comes from?
Enlarge JelleS/Flickr.com

Do you know where your beef comes from?

If you want to know where your meat came from, you won't be happy with the World Trade Organization right now. Late last week, the WTO announced that the United States' country-of-origin labels, which took effect in 2008, discriminate unfairly against foreign meat suppliers such as Mexico and Canada.

Some consumer groups were outraged by the WTO's decision; the beef industry, not so much. The ruling could mean that the U.S. will have to abandon those labels, but hang on, maybe not. In the world of international trade, the wheels of justice turn very slowly indeed. Years are likely to pass before you'll see any change in those food labels, as U.S. officials figure out a way to comply with the WTO ruling.

In fact, officials at the Office of the US Trade Representative are holding out hope that the labels will survive. They point out that the WTO didn't object to the labels themselves, but rather the system for implementing them.

Here's the difficulty with that system. Unlike, say, corn fields, animals tend to move around, so it's a little more difficult to say where they came from.

Take the case of beef cattle that were born in Mexico, but arrived in the U.S. as calves and grew to adulthood here, says Colin Woodall, from the National Cattlemen's Beef Association. Under the U.S. labeling system, meat from those animals is labeled as coming from the U.S. and also from Mexico. To make sure the right label goes on that meat, a meat packer typically will keep those animals separate from the much larger number of U.S.-origin animals, which costs time and money.


This process results in greater expense (keeping the animals separated and properly recorded), so slaughterhouses pay less for the smaller number of foreign sourced cattle.

One alternative is making the label voluntary, but some argue that would lead to selective use. Another is to use the slaughterhouse as the label point.


Labels
"Peter Kiewit looked for three things in hiring people. He looked for integrity, intelligence and energy. And he said if a person didn’t have the first…that the latter two would kill him. Because if they don’t have integrity, you want ‘em dumb and lazy. You don’t want ‘em smart and energetic.”

Warren Buffett

#2 Really Nice!

Really Nice!

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 446 posts

Posted 05 July 2012 - 03:30 AM

NPR.org reports that the World Trade Organization has agreed with complaints from Mexico and Canada that US requirements for "county of origin" labels on meat are discriminatory. The two countries had raised the issue, contending the labels caused customers to shun imported meat.

There may be some truth to that because I refuse to buy Trader Joe's hamburger. The "county of origin" on label shows five countries: Argentina, Australia, Canada, Mexico, and the U.S. Try tracking e.coli on that package. And while I prefer to grind my own hamburger, who knows the source of what I'm eating when I eat a Red Mill or In n' Out burger.

What about "county of origin" labels on fish/shellfish?

#3 Rail Paul

Rail Paul

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 17,547 posts

Posted 05 July 2012 - 01:14 PM


NPR.org reports that the World Trade Organization has agreed with complaints from Mexico and Canada that US requirements for "county of origin" labels on meat are discriminatory. The two countries had raised the issue, contending the labels caused customers to shun imported meat.

There may be some truth to that because I refuse to buy Trader Joe's hamburger. The "county of origin" on label shows five countries: Argentina, Australia, Canada, Mexico, and the U.S. Try tracking e.coli on that package. And while I prefer to grind my own hamburger, who knows the source of what I'm eating when I eat a Red Mill or In n' Out burger.

What about "county of origin" labels on fish/shellfish?


we have country of origin labels on fish in the markets here in NJ. It usually reads something like
"Country of Origin: Indonesia,
Farm Raised Shrimp, Under-16 (etc) per pound".

Some stores will add "line caught" or "sustainable" on the label. Line caught, of course, includes those half mile long, thousand hook strands.
"Peter Kiewit looked for three things in hiring people. He looked for integrity, intelligence and energy. And he said if a person didn’t have the first…that the latter two would kill him. Because if they don’t have integrity, you want ‘em dumb and lazy. You don’t want ‘em smart and energetic.”

Warren Buffett