Jump to content


Photo

BLT Fish


  • Please log in to reply
88 replies to this topic

#61 mitchells

mitchells

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,391 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 07:07 PM

I think you also need to figure the spoilage costs at a fish house are significantly higher than at a steakhouse which has to factor into the price.
"The work of science is to substitute facts for appearances and demonstrations for impressions." -John Ruskin

#62 ngatti

ngatti

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,197 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 07:24 PM

Nick, I agree but I'd bet a bunch of the places charging $36 or more per steak (Mortons is up to $42 for a porterhouse!) are NOT buying the high quality stuff.

Or spending the money to age it properly.

Morton's is for tourists. :blink:
yer 'avin' a larf, mate

#63 ngatti

ngatti

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,197 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 07:25 PM

and I said good restaurant steak. :blink:
yer 'avin' a larf, mate

#64 ngatti

ngatti

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,197 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 07:26 PM

I think you also need to figure the spoilage costs at a fish house are significantly higher than at a steakhouse which has to factor into the price.

Maybe if we were talking about Prunier. I dunno. I'm figuring NYC and costs of labor. Maybe.
yer 'avin' a larf, mate

#65 Ron Johnson

Ron Johnson

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 8,958 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 07:55 PM

I think you also need to figure the spoilage costs at a fish house are significantly higher than at a steakhouse which has to factor into the price.

what, you don't like those dry-aged fish?

#66 Wilfrid1

Wilfrid1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 42,108 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 08:13 PM

Another angle is that the prices at Cello must have been similar for much smaller pieces of fish, but incorporated in beautifully executed composed dishes, rather than grilled with sauce on the side. I am much happier paying for the chef's skill than for so many lbs of food. Of course, BLT Fish is probably doing great business, so...
Elect-a-lujah

***Every Monday***At the Sign of the Pink Pig.

If the author could go around the place hitting random readers with a rubber hammer, the Pink Pig would still be worth a visit.

#67 g.johnson

g.johnson

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 18,877 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 08:14 PM

We got out for $115 per head with a fairly cheap bottle and no deserts. Not ridiculous.
The Obnoxious Glyn Johnson

#68 Wilfrid1

Wilfrid1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 42,108 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 08:15 PM

But didn't you eat in the casual fish shack downstairs? That's much cheaper.
Elect-a-lujah

***Every Monday***At the Sign of the Pink Pig.

If the author could go around the place hitting random readers with a rubber hammer, the Pink Pig would still be worth a visit.

#69 yvonne johnson

yvonne johnson

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 8,068 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 08:16 PM

Wilf, scroll back to previous page, sorry 2 pages back.

Why do I bother posting at this place? :blink:

Added: we've eaten at the shack too, a meal I also posted on.
It was not a new dish, as I recognised my tooth marks. Wilfrid

#70 Wilfrid1

Wilfrid1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 42,108 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 08:21 PM

Oops, sorry - flashed back to your first report. With the 1.5 lb fish and sides, you were eating more or less $35 entrees. Not so bad. I was fixated on the 2-3 lbs average per fish posted on menupages. Did your server consult with you on fish size? The difference between a 1.5 lb fish for $50 and a 2 lb fish for $68 is not insignificant.
Elect-a-lujah

***Every Monday***At the Sign of the Pink Pig.

If the author could go around the place hitting random readers with a rubber hammer, the Pink Pig would still be worth a visit.

#71 ngatti

ngatti

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,197 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 08:23 PM

I believe that same sole is 36-38 in toto at BLT Steak.
yer 'avin' a larf, mate

#72 Wilfrid1

Wilfrid1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 42,108 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 08:25 PM

Ah. Maybe the solution is to order steak at BLT FIsh. It may be a bargain. :blink:
Elect-a-lujah

***Every Monday***At the Sign of the Pink Pig.

If the author could go around the place hitting random readers with a rubber hammer, the Pink Pig would still be worth a visit.

#73 g.johnson

g.johnson

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 18,877 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 09:41 PM

Did your server consult with you on fish size?

No but he also didn't ask us whether we wanted the fish on or off the bone (both are meant to be available) so it could of been him rather than policy.
The Obnoxious Glyn Johnson

#74 marcus

marcus

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 475 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 09:53 PM

I believe that same sole is 36-38 in toto at BLT Steak.

I think that we are floundering on this price issue, as we don't know the quality of fish that's being used. There are quality levels that would justify their prices.

#75 macrosan

macrosan

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,471 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 10:15 PM

The whole fishes are meant to be shared. When G and I went we shared a dover sole ($34 per lb, and it weighed in at 1& 1/2 lbs).

Two weeks ago, I had a 24oz Dover sole at J Sheekey and it cost £23, which is about $44.