Peter Luger
#1
Posted 19 April 2004 - 10:01 PM
A significantly sized order of bacon spun our waiter into a long and winding story, the essence of which was that bacon as appetizer has been spreading virally among diners - where a few years ago everyone would order tomatoes and/or shrimp cocktails, bacon now reigns supreme. The steak was very good, but far from the best we've had there. It still vanished very quickly and as always, left us promising ourselves to go back there more often.
#2
Posted 20 April 2004 - 12:21 AM
And would be the perfect barsnack. (Through deep-fried salted yuba works pretty well.)
"Behold, I teach you the ubermunch. The ubermunch is the meaning of the earth. Let your will say: the ubermunch shall be the meaning of the earth!" -Fritzy N.
"It's okay to like celery more than yogurt, but it's not okay to think that batter is yogurt."
#3
Posted 20 April 2004 - 01:54 PM
In which ways did the stek differ from what you've had before? I wonder if this is a consequence of the alleged prime beef shortage?
Warren Buffett
#4
Posted 20 April 2004 - 02:21 PM
The tenderloin side was very good, but the strip/sirloin side was less marbled and less flavorful than it is on the average steak there. I couldn't say what the reason was, possibly just a random fluctuation.In which ways did the stek differ from what you've had before? I wonder if this is a consequence of the alleged prime beef shortage?
#5
Posted 25 April 2004 - 02:27 AM
#6
Posted 25 April 2004 - 03:51 AM
#7
Posted 25 April 2004 - 04:04 AM
Yes, Luger's shrimp cocktail is awful and the tomatos are like cardboard. But, I don't think that an appetizer is required, why not plunge directly into the steak and fixings, followed by a real fun hot fudge sundae. And getting to the heart of the matter and speaking of the steak, what's been your recent experience?I agree about the bacon, Marcus. It's a fairly prosaic speciman, although cut thick from the slab. Of course it's a major food group for me so any port in a storm etc...and it beats some of the poorest shrimp cocktail (IMO) in existence.
#8
Posted 25 April 2004 - 04:20 AM
People have good things to say about the Hamburger. I didn't think it was very good at all. Steak for two, in my past vists, has been the way I go. This next vist also.
#9
Posted 25 April 2004 - 03:49 PM
#10
Posted 25 April 2004 - 05:09 PM
Steve
#11
Posted 25 April 2004 - 05:38 PM
#12
Posted 25 April 2004 - 07:47 PM
Steve
#13
Posted 25 April 2004 - 08:42 PM
It just doesn't come close to Luger's, and for the same price, you leave feeling ripped off.
#14
Posted 25 April 2004 - 09:24 PM
It's the least bad appetizer by far, which still means it's better than any of the desserts (I generally don't eat dessert, but the one time I tried them at PL I felt they were exceptionally terrible). I'll think about the possibility of focusing on steak alone, but then we might need a steak for three to feed two.I didn't like the flavor and I didn't like the salt load, so this item I'm crossing off permanently.
edit: not to sound too negative, the steak alone is worth more trips than the 2-3 a year we've been averaging
#15
Posted 25 April 2004 - 09:56 PM
re Appetizers: How about ordering lamb chops as a shared appetizer? Back when a large chunk of prime rib (not the delicate lunch portion) was sometimes available at dinnertime, we'd order one of those as an app.
re Luger clones: I haven't been to MarkJoseph in over a year, but I remember their bacon as being MUCH better than Luger's, though the steaks were blood- and soul-less.
-- Favorite Twilight Zone cookbook












