Jump to content


Photo

New York Times


  • Please log in to reply
231 replies to this topic

#211 Behemoth

Behemoth

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 7,989 posts

Posted 24 October 2019 - 10:05 PM

Simples! 


Summarizing, then, we assume that relational information is not subject to a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test.
-Chomskybot

#212 Wilfrid

Wilfrid

    Advanced Member

  • Admin
  • PipPipPip
  • 86,863 posts

Posted 25 October 2019 - 12:27 AM

No can do.

#213 Sneakeater

Sneakeater

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 64,849 posts

Posted 25 October 2019 - 06:17 AM

I don't know why it took them more than 70 years to decide the Schleswig-Holstein Question.

 

I mean, come on, decide:  Denmark or Germany?


Bar Loser

MF Old

#214 Sneakeater

Sneakeater

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 64,849 posts

Posted 25 October 2019 - 06:18 AM

[double post]


Bar Loser

MF Old

#215 Sneakeater

Sneakeater

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 64,849 posts

Posted 25 October 2019 - 07:52 PM

In case anyone genuinely doesn't understand why Brexit isn't simple:            https://www.newyorke...brexit-will-end


Bar Loser

MF Old

#216 Wilfrid

Wilfrid

    Advanced Member

  • Admin
  • PipPipPip
  • 86,863 posts

Posted 26 October 2019 - 12:30 AM

As I have been explaining to anyone interested for months now, the constitutional jam over exit is caused by the fact that the referendum, randomly invented by PM Cameron, has no legal force. Parliament is sovereign, members are there to represent their constituents, not the “will of the people,” so you won’t get a Brexit until Parliament agrees; a fact underlined by BJ’s great wheeze of shutting Parliament down.

#217 Wilfrid

Wilfrid

    Advanced Member

  • Admin
  • PipPipPip
  • 86,863 posts

Posted 26 October 2019 - 12:33 AM

Imagine a referendum in the US over, say, gun laws. The will of the people says, let’s do x, y, z.

Senate says, well no.

#218 Orik

Orik

    Advanced Member

  • Technocrat
  • PipPipPip
  • 22,208 posts

Posted 26 October 2019 - 01:03 AM

Wouldn't it be simpler, not to mention cheaper, to seek out some number of people who supported this idiocy and execute them by order of The Queen before holding another referendum?


sandwiches that are large and filling and do not contain tuna or prawns

#219 voyager

voyager

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5,580 posts

Posted 26 October 2019 - 01:27 AM

If you doubt the influence of the press...  https://www.nytimes....york-times.html


It's not my circus,

not my monkeys.


#220 Behemoth

Behemoth

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 7,989 posts

Posted 26 October 2019 - 06:44 AM

Wouldn't it be simpler, not to mention cheaper, to seek out some number of people who supported this idiocy and execute them by order of The Queen before holding another referendum?

 

Referenda are simply an unacceptable form of governance -- and frankly an abdication of leadership -- when it comes to decisions that catastrophically punish one subset of the population for the perceived benefit of a small (or even large) majority. This is exactly why we have parliaments and (for better or worse) why the US senate is constructed as it is. 


Summarizing, then, we assume that relational information is not subject to a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test.
-Chomskybot

#221 Orik

Orik

    Advanced Member

  • Technocrat
  • PipPipPip
  • 22,208 posts

Posted 26 October 2019 - 11:52 AM

I thought we had parliaments to make lobbying work more productive.

But I agree of course.
sandwiches that are large and filling and do not contain tuna or prawns

#222 Rich

Rich

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 8,794 posts

Posted 26 October 2019 - 01:12 PM

All of this is true, but the incessant back and forth is what makes it ludicrous. The British have never fully embraced the EU (never accepted the Euro over the Pound, etc...), always felt they were supporting "lazy" nations - their word not mine.

At the end someone, somewhere needs to have the courage and insight to make a decision. What makes this "not simple" is the total ineptitude of those seeking to put forward their own agenda.

That New Yorker article makes it appear as an impossible situation, which it's not. It's only impossible because the "leaders" can't or won't see the forest for the trees.

#223 Orik

Orik

    Advanced Member

  • Technocrat
  • PipPipPip
  • 22,208 posts

Posted 26 October 2019 - 01:42 PM

Right, if only they had the wisdom of North American leaders who have long ago formed a single federation, redrew and reduced the number of historical subdivisions ("states"), and allowed free immigration to fill up their giant swaths of empty land. 


sandwiches that are large and filling and do not contain tuna or prawns

#224 Rich

Rich

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 8,794 posts

Posted 26 October 2019 - 03:35 PM

LOL

#225 Sneakeater

Sneakeater

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 64,849 posts

Posted 27 October 2019 - 03:19 AM

All of this is true, but the incessant back and forth is what makes it ludicrous. The British have never fully embraced the EU (never accepted the Euro over the Pound, etc...), always felt they were supporting "lazy" nations - their word not mine.

At the end someone, somewhere needs to have the courage and insight to make a decision. What makes this "not simple" is the total ineptitude of those seeking to put forward their own agenda.

That New Yorker article makes it appear as an impossible situation, which it's not. It's only impossible because the "leaders" can't or won't see the forest for the trees.


Denmark seems able to do this without any undo angst.

The problem is that David Cameron unwisely called for that referendum, and given the Irish border there’s no intelligent politically acceptable way to effectuate the result.

(Also the vision of post-EU Britain held by the faction whose propaganda caused that result is truly odious— and not what the Leavers were led to believe they were voting for.)
Bar Loser

MF Old