hollywood Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 Now, now! You are the last person who should forget about throwing stones. You don't even have a tree in your front yard. Huh? I thought Stone lived in a tree. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ghostrider Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 Anybody have any ADVANTAGES to smoking, other than a farmer can actually live on a year's income of raising tobacco? This is something I don't discuss much, but since you asked - I had a severe stutter from childhood through my mid 20s. It played hell with my education - I was incapable of asking questions in class - not to mention my social life. Smoking was the only thing that seemed to alleviate it & eventually cure it. I couldn't have held down a "normal" job (literary agent to Colin Wilson, Spiro Agnew & other literary luminaries, as some may recall) if I hadn't been able to smoke at my desk in the 1970s. I can't tell you whether the effect was chemical or psychological - probably both - but it was effective where speech therapists & counsellors weren't. Of course it left me a smoker & almost killed me & I now have the lungs of someone 10 years older & the lung function I've lost won't come back, says my doc. Still, cigarettes made me the person I am, and on some level every effort to demonize smoking just ticks me right off. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rebecca Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 Thank you, Ghostrider. That was a very poignant story. Cigarettes, then, can work like singing does to some people. Very interesting. I know it re-wires the brain. You can see it in MRI/CAT scans. So much of the brain is still just a new horizon. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
macrosan Posted July 4, 2007 Share Posted July 4, 2007 I am just speechless with admiration at Macro's ability to balance dedicated opposition to smoking with no less zealous opposition to nanny-stating based on junk science. Well done! The real treat will be to hear him restate his position a year from now when the ban has been in place and life continues as before but with cleaner air. It is the triple axel of logic. My position will be exactly the same. Exactly as Wilf says, I am now a committed opponent of smoking, and a dedicated opponent of nanny-stating, and I will be those at all times in the future. What I have realised with the years is that life never "continues as before" once the state has intervened . People suffer, people accept new norms, society adopts new standards, but life will never be as it was before. The question at issue is only whether those changes are for good or for bad. Looking back at state intervention in both the UK and the USA, I see plenty to suggest that society has worsened as a result of many of those interventions. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
macrosan Posted July 4, 2007 Share Posted July 4, 2007 Anybody have any ADVANTAGES to smoking, other than a farmer can actually live on a year's income of raising tobacco? Supposedly one doesn't live as long, therefore the risks of getting dementia or Alzheimer's are greatly reduced. Smoking has great benefits to the citizenry. The industry generates a significant amount of tax dollars on the front end. On the back end, by causing people to die early and relatively quickly, it saves the health care industry significant costs in long-term geriatric care. The bigger financial benefit to society is that the early deaths caused by smoking massively reduce the future liabilities for pension payments. And that "gain" increases all the time with increasing life expectation. In the early 1990s when the anti-tobacco movement was gaining real impetus, the tobacco companies commissioned a report from Arthur Anderson (I think) into the cost/benefits of smoking in Eastern European countries, so that they could persuade the governments of those countries to encourage smoking. The report (even allowing for obvious bias) clearly demonstrated a huge net financial benefit to government of smoking. One thing which may have changed since then is that mortality rates from smoking seem to be increasing. It's interesting that the Prof says that COPD is now a major killer, and I think that ten years ago it was considered (apart from emphysema) to be little more than a minor-leaguer compared to heart disease and cancer. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Posted July 4, 2007 Share Posted July 4, 2007 Take the pipe. haha Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hollywood Posted July 4, 2007 Share Posted July 4, 2007 Take the pipe. haha As opposed to laying some pipe. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Anny Posted July 4, 2007 Share Posted July 4, 2007 Well if John Smeaton hadn't been having a fly fag (ciggie) would Glasgow airport be here today? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rail Paul Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 Chronic Disease Killers as of 2004 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wilfrid1 Posted July 5, 2007 Author Share Posted July 5, 2007 Anybody have any ADVANTAGES to smoking, other than a farmer can actually live on a year's income of raising tobacco? This is something I don't discuss much, but since you asked - I had a severe stutter from childhood through my mid 20s. It played hell with my education - I was incapable of asking questions in class - not to mention my social life. Smoking was the only thing that seemed to alleviate it & eventually cure it. I couldn't have held down a "normal" job (literary agent to Colin Wilson, Spiro Agnew & other literary luminaries, as some may recall) if I hadn't been able to smoke at my desk in the 1970s. I can't tell you whether the effect was chemical or psychological - probably both - but it was effective where speech therapists & counsellors weren't. Of course it left me a smoker & almost killed me & I now have the lungs of someone 10 years older & the lung function I've lost won't come back, says my doc. Still, cigarettes made me the person I am, and on some level every effort to demonize smoking just ticks me right off. Without wishing to equate stuttering and Tourette's, there is data suggesting that nicotine is therapeutic for physical and vocal "tics" associated with the syndrome. Possibly some connection there. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rebecca Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 Look what showed up today at Yahoo news: Smoking might prevent Parkinsons Disease. HERE Interesting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
macrosan Posted July 10, 2007 Share Posted July 10, 2007 Look what showed up today at Yahoo news: Smoking might prevent Parkinsons Disease. Yeah. Death has a similar preventative effect. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
taion Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Apparently the most up-to-date research finds no statistically significant public health benefit from smoking bans: http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/medical_examiner/2017/02/secondhand_smoke_isn_t_as_bad_as_we_thought.html Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wilfrid Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 It would be astonishing if the results were otherwise. Comfort is hugely improved. And I say that with feeling having choked my way through a few LV casinos recently. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.