Wilfrid Posted September 22, 2016 Share Posted September 22, 2016 I see your point, but from the photos and the review (I haven't eaten Seeger's food), it's hard to see how you could fine something to say about one and not the other. And Hergatt had some contemporary relevance. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Neocon maudit Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 I sometimes wish Mongo were here to help us assess the recent influx of more ambitious Indian restaurants. [it's interesting that they're mostly imports.] Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lex Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 I sometimes wish Mongo were here to help us assess the recent influx of more ambitious Indian restaurants. [it's interesting that they're mostly imports.] He doesn't have to be here. He can do comprehensive reviews based on the pictures alone. It's a rare talent. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Anthony Bonner Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 me-ow Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wilfrid Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Interestingly, I was probably eating Indian food before Mongo was born. But only the nasty orange stuff. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Orik Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 Surely the end of days is upon us when a location of a would be casual eatery chain by an out of town chef gets two stars. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mongo_jones Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 I sometimes wish Mongo were here to help us assess the recent influx of more ambitious Indian restaurants. [it's interesting that they're mostly imports.] He doesn't have to be here. He can do comprehensive reviews based on the pictures alone. It's a rare talent. yes. and based on those photos it's crap. save your money. i mean, seriously, has the times cut its food photography budget? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mitchells Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 Wilf is moonlighting for them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GerryOlds Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 A star each for Zadie's Oyster Room and Karasu: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/19/dining/karasu-zadies-oyster-room-review.html With a reference to the review last year which included Mekelburg's. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sneakeater Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 I thought Wells's Beatrice Inn review was strange. Strange in a good way. He clearly loved the place: the only negative comment he had was that they don't pay enough attention to vegetables, which he didn't seem to mind at all. Yet, he gave the place the two stars it clearly seems to warrant, rather than three. Why can Wells do this sometimes but not other times: realize that he can love a restaurant and that it can still be a two-star place? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lex Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Eater's going to go nuts about this. They've been carrying a torch for the Beatrice Inn for years. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wilfrid Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 It's a bit worrying that this appears in the "Barely Cooked" section of the menu: SAVORY PLUM TART / 23 Italian Prunes, Wild Arugula, Parmesan But it does make me wonder whether the jam tart with shaved cheddar at Cockscomb is part of a trend. Nice menu altogether. Game pie; lamb Wellington at $47 for two people. Hadn't been thinking about this place. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sneakeater Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 It got a decent amount of buzz when Chef Mar purchased it a few months ago (and promised to make it even meatier). Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Suzanne F Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Well, he did mention some items that did not work for him, and he thought the desserts could use some work, the cocktails are "somewhat busy," and the wine list needs more bottles under $70. Maybe that's his justification for only two. But I will say that his descriptions of many of the dishes made me want to try it. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wilfrid Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 It got a decent amount of buzz when Chef Mar purchased it a few months ago (and promised to make it even meatier). I just missed that transition. No excuses. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.