Wilfrid Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 Can I cease from my raging fury at JoJo’s legacy three star rating when the restaurant and menu were long ago fundamentally changed? Please say yes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sneakeater Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 That was the first thing I looked for (and didn’t find). Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Orik Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 One un(?)intended consequence of the recent changes is that places from the 25 and under column, whatever it's called now, get the same "critic's pick" tag as everyone. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rozrapp Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 @Wilfrid @Sneakeater I Googled “JoJo restaurant review NYTimes.” The original 1991 review by Brian Miller comes up, as well as the 2002 William Grimes review. Both show ***. Obviously, still in the database though not reachable if you are searching via the Times site (which I’m guessing is how Sneakeater looked for it). Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sneakeater Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 Right. I don't think anyone objects to the review's still existing (I mean, it was published; it's a fact). I think the objection always has been that JoJo would still come up as a three-star restaurant if you were searching the Times database for one. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wilfrid Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 Exactly. I mean, I still read ancient restaurant reviews just for pleasure. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.