Jump to content

Ligaya Mishan/Tejal Rao


Wilfrid

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, Wilfrid said:

In this case, Smithereens must have been wondering what the agency was doing for ten months.

It's actually what many places would prefer. Waiting until they get their feet under them. This recent round of coordinated PR is not coincidence. All places where stories get placed rather than happen organically. 

Capture.PNG

Edited by backyardchef
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Wilfrid said:

I think you'd agree that the Times, in particular, has not traditionally waited 10 months for a PR trigger to review a restaurant.

 

I'm not sure that I would agree, but they also didn't have a dedicated reviewer and spend less time on NYC restaurants. As I have said in the past I can only comment on what I know and having been involved in the promotion of multiple restaurants there is a lot more coordination and long lead coordination with publications than people think. I completely understand why people would choose to not believe that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, sweatshorts said:

That martini does not taste like seawater at all, but instead like a regular martini in which they steeped a tea bag for 45 seconds. I hated it.

Sadly, I think the era  (like turn of the century through 2015ish) of great bartenders (mixologists??) creating great cocktails that we actually want to drink - is behind us.

 

 

Edited by MitchW
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/22/2025 at 11:38 AM, backyardchef said:

I'm not sure that I would agree, but they also didn't have a dedicated reviewer and spend less time on NYC restaurants. As I have said in the past I can only comment on what I know and having been involved in the promotion of multiple restaurants there is a lot more coordination and long lead coordination with publications than people think. I completely understand why people would choose to not believe that. 

Not arguing with that; saying that the reviewers holding off for 10 months is really odd and not explained by that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/23/2025 at 5:57 PM, Wilfrid said:

Not arguing with that; saying that the reviewers holding off for 10 months is really odd and not explained by that.

It was more urgent to cover location #187 of Din Tai Fung!

Overall with just one nyc restaurant reviewed every three weeks on average now, many get covered after 6-7 months, but yes 10 months is very long. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Orik said:

It was more urgent to cover location #187 of Din Tai Fung!

Overall with just one nyc restaurant reviewed every three weeks on average now, many get covered after 6-7 months, but yes 10 months is very long. 

Yes. A lot of places will be missed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Would be interesting to see Ligaya and Tejal's expenses report for September with meals (plural) at Alinea and Atelier Crenn.

Also, I see seven out of the last ten reviews have featured non-New York restaurants. No wonder we don't talk about these reviews much any more.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

there's clearly a correction in progress in the post-wells era re the times' coverage of restaurants serving non-european/japanese-derived food. arguably, an over-correction from time to time (see the bungalow embarrassment) but what's the issue with the korai kitchen review?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Utility. 

For me, anyway, and likely for many other readers. I guess, if you are lucky enough to score a reservation on one of the two nights they open each week, seating 15 people, and if you drive and therefore don't care about no alcohol, or if Jersey City is convenient for you, it might be a useful review.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...