Jump to content

The New Yorker


Wilfrid

Recommended Posts

Alex Barasch's piece on actor/director Halina Reijn is interesting but when they get to the Morgan Library and Museum, fantasy takes over. Or, the charitable view, things that actually happened are very poorly described.

Barasch and Reijn had "learned" there was a copy of Frank Wedekind's "Lulu" in the library. From an unreliable source as Lulu is a character in two plays, neither of which is called "Lulu." A docent, no less, directs them to the room with multiple levels of bookshelves. They can't, surprise, find "Lulu."

Yes, there are modern collections containing those plays (and usually "Spring Awakening") that have names like "The Lulu Plays." A bit after Morgan's time. In fact, the first of the plays was translated into English after Morgan's death.

It's possible a copy of "Erdgeist" is in there somewhere and their informant knew that to be the case. But where in the Morgan do you need to whisper because of the "hush" of the library? Pure fantasy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I confess I enjoyed the digital interactive thing where you had to drag cartoons into a timeline to get them into chronological order. Like there was an obviously ancient one that turned out to be 1929, but if it was about COVID you knew it was later than that. Fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/21/2024 at 6:16 PM, StephanieL said:

If I ever have her over for a meal, I'll have to remember not to serve her goop.

Did I ever mention that we went to High School together?  She was a grade behind me and I don't think I knew her, but still, that's something to post no? 😏

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe one-off contributions from people like movie director Luca Guadgnino don't get an edit, other than for spelling and grammar. This is a badly written piece. But what is annoying is the claim that Mann won the Nobel Prize for Buddenbrooks. The prize is not awarded for specific works, although one can sometimes speculate the a particular book tipped the balance. Buddenbrooks was published in 1901. Mann won the prize twenty-eight years later, not coincidentally, I suspect, four years after he published The Magic Mountain. So the claim makes it look like Guadignino (fair enough, he's a movie director) but also The New Yorker don't really know much about Thomas Mann.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...