Jump to content

Currently Reading...


Recommended Posts

Halfway to Hollywood: Diaries 1980-1988 - the second volume of Michael Palin's diaries. Covers his movie years: MP Live at the Hollywood Bowl, Time Bandits, The Missionary, MP's The Meaning of Life, Brazil, A Private Function, A Fish Called Wanda. I don't think there is another celebrity who would include photos of his/her newsagent and house painter in an autobiography, just because he likes them.
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 5.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Just finished Ask the Dust by John Fante, a slim novel which didn't live up to the extravagant praise I've heard from Bukowski fans. Henry Miller and Hubert Selby did this kind of thing much better.

I'm currently reading Middlesex, has anyone else read it? I remember it being discussed elsewhere and people were criticizing the fact that it won the pulitzer prize. Maybe not Pulitzer Prize worthy

Several of the pieces in Paris to the Moon appeared earlier as Gopnik's monthly Letters from Paris to The New Yorker. His use of adjectives to describe the weather, the neighborhood, etc impressed me

Posted Images

Charles Bambach's Heidegger's Roots, a very clearly written but flawed discussion of sources of Heidegger's 1933-1945 writings. Not much point discussing it here, as my objections would either be boring to non-Heidegger scholars or far too politically exciting for the board.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
Some here might know the significance if I report that I am currently reading Rogue Herries by Hugh Walpole...

Have you suddenly come over all peckish?

I keep wondering when the bouzouki player and dancers will come into it.

 

There is a great YouTube clip of Cleese explaining the origin of the sketch...

 

1x2yvK4gbjM

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Brief History of Stonehenge / Aubrey Burl / 2007

 

I've been fascinated by Stonehenge ever since I was a boy, when I was lucky enough to visit the site before it was roped off to the public. That led me to a wider interest in megalithic monuments and a small collection of books on the subject, including several earlier works by Burl.

 

While I'm tiring of these Brief History titles, this book is much more than that trendy appellation implies. Early on, in a review of the Stonehenge literature, Burl notes that a significant book has appeared roughly every ten years in recent decades, starting with Richard Atkinson's Stonehenge in 1956. He clearly hopes that this book will be viewed as the next in that series, with some justification. This is an excellent compendium of the major findings at Stonehenge; it pulls together a wealth of detail that tells the story of the site's evolution as a ceremonial, ritual and funerary center over more than two thousand years, and places it in the context of the cultures that built other sites in the British Isles and Brittany during that vast span of time.

 

It's full of intriguing tidbits, such as the possible derivation of the word "sarsen," which was "sazzan" in earlier centuries. Do these terms share a proto-Indo-European ancestor with "sasan" from the Chotanagpur area in northern India, which refers to large stone slabs used in prehistoric burial grounds there? Are they related to the Anglo-Saxon "sar-stan," which literally means "grievous stone" and described the large stones that had to be cleared from fields?

 

Burl describes the Station Stones, four large megaliths (only two survive today) erected a century before the trilithon circle; the Station Stones marked out a giant rectangle centered on the earthwork henge that was the site's earliest construction. The site of the last missing stone was found in 1978; the astronomical alignments of the rectangle have been analyzed since I'd done my last reading on Stonehenge. The short sides of the rectangle pointed to the midsummer sunrise; its diagonals pointed to varoius solar and lunar events which marked the Quarter Days, those in-between points of the year which the Celts, many centuries later, made into the festival days of Imbolc, Beltane, Lughnasa and Samain.

 

I can't explain my lifelong fascination with this stuff, but if you have a similar bent, this book is essential reading. It's oddly repetitive in places; I think that Burl would have benefitted from a collaboration with a good editor. That's a just small quibble; this book will take you on a grand trip through prehistoric time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

earl lovelace, "the dragon can't dance". one of the great first paragraphs in all of novel-dom:

 

"This is the hill tall above the city where Taffy, a man who say he is Christ, put himself up on a cross one burning midday and say to his followers: 'Crucify me! Let me die for my people. Stone me with stones as you stone Jesus, I will love you still.' And when they start to stone him in truth he get vex and start to cuss...: 'Get me down! Get me down!' he say. 'Let every sinnerman bear his own blasted burden; who is I to die for people who ain't have sense enough to know that they can't pelt a man with big stones when so much little pebbles lying on the ground.'"

Link to post
Share on other sites
A Brief History of Stonehenge / Aubrey Burl / 2007

 

I've been fascinated by Stonehenge ever since I was a boy, when I was lucky enough to visit the site before it was roped off to the public.

 

You know they had a woodhenge there once? But it rotted.

Link to post
Share on other sites
A Brief History of Stonehenge / Aubrey Burl / 2007

 

I've been fascinated by Stonehenge ever since I was a boy, when I was lucky enough to visit the site before it was roped off to the public.

 

You know they had a woodhenge there once? But it rotted.

Yup. There was also one of those in Illinois near the Cahokia earthworks, not far across the Mississippi River from St. Louis, where I grew up.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Charles Bambach's Heidegger's Roots, a very clearly written but flawed discussion of sources of Heidegger's 1933-1945 writings. Not much point discussing it here, as my objections would either be boring to non-Heidegger scholars or far too politically exciting for the board.

 

This is the kind of shit I want to know but I am always afraid to ask.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...