Jump to content

Places to be Curious About


Wilfrid

Recommended Posts

Are you sure that there's an upstairs from the bar/restaurant?  I just went to their website & the "our story" section (see below link) says the theater is downstairs (& talks a little about the Lewis Black days - "playwright in residence"?!).  https://www.westbankcafe.com/our_story  Maybe you walked backwards on the stairway?  I've done that.  Especially back in those days.

On the "learn something new" front, I didn't know until I read that section that The Who played the restaurant while the 1st staging of Tommy was on Bdway.  We went to that production & have now gone to the new one (currently in previews).  We sure as hell would've found a way to see The Who when they were there had we known.

Edited by Steve R.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reasonably good.  It's in previews and we expect there to be quite a bit of "tightening up" (as Ginny puts it) before the opening date.  I liked the 1st production better, but it had more of an audience memory to work with.  Here, they have to assume that they may be playing to an audience who isn't very familiar with the history and context (or fans).  And, they aren't totally going for the same "take away" in this one either (as Townsend pretty much said in his NYT interview).  For me, on the other hand, well I had immediately bought the album when released (I was a huge "The Who Sell Out" fan), saw The Who perform Tommy in its entirety in 1970, then saw the movie, then the 1st Broadway production.  So, I was doing more of a comparison than an "in its own right" viewing.  And I still liked it well enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks! I did not see it in 1970, as that would have meant staying up past my bedtime. But I've seen the movie many times - I used to teach a course in adaptation, and Tommy was two of the texts. I have such a strong attachment to certain sequences that I wonder if I'm going to be able to connect to the new production.

14 minutes ago, Steve R. said:

they aren't totally going for the same "take away" in this one either

 Now I'm very curious as to the new one's "take away." I should probably just read the interview.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, read the interview and we'll talk.  And, when you go, count the # of people around you who may not know what pinball was (is?).  Luckily, acid hasn't lost its reference point.  (or, unfortunately, pedaphilia or post-traumatic injury for that matter) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, small h said:

You say this like it's a bad thing.

It totally is.  That menu was great.  All this organ meat and other hardcore Ashkenazi stuff you don't see anywhere.

This was one of the first great instances of a Restaurant's Regressing To The Mean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were fine.  The whole reason all that other stuff was classic Ashkenazi food is that (unlike steak) it was easy to get decent quality cheap (since contrary to libel most Ashkenazic Jews were POOR).

And yeah, early days the cooking was fine. (Mind you, I only experienced that ONCE, the first time I went in the early ‘80s.  After that it was like, where’d it go ?)

Edited by Sneakeater
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went around 2016 with a group, and some dishes were great and some were less than good. The atmosphere and schmaltz (including the 'entertainment') were there. It's a worthwhile NYC experience, but the food is only part of the reason to go there, and probably not the top of that list.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...