Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Sneakeater said:

See this is the kind of place Sietsema is qualified to write about.

https://ny.eater.com/2023/11/13/23922620/da-andrea-greenwich-village-review

It's when he writes about ambitious places that he says stupid, inaccurate, and indeed uncomprehending shit (and it's not just Foxface Natural).

So this is what Eater is good for now.

So, just to confirm... he SHOULD write about "ambitious places," or no? You seem ambivalent.Ā 

Edited by backyardchef
Posted (edited)

The problem isn't that his judgments about ambitious places are wrong.Ā  The problem is that he has no basis for speaking about them.Ā  He can't support his judgments factually or logically.Ā  He just gets things wrong.

Ā 

Edited by Sneakeater
Posted
2 minutes ago, Sneakeater said:

The problem isn't that his judgments about ambitious places are wrong.Ā  The problem is that he has no basis for speaking about them.Ā  He can't support his judgments factually or logically.Ā  He just gets things wrong.

Ā 

I still can't quite how you feel about this. šŸ˜Ž

Ā 

Seriously though, I have not seen a food critic that doesn't get it wrong. I understand, however, that this issue is close to your heart.Ā 

Posted

I think Pete Wells gets it right, mostly.

Meaning, again, not that I agree with him, but that he makes sense and sounds like he knows what he's talking about (about a broad range, too).

Posted
2 minutes ago, Sneakeater said:

But of course I don't know as much as you do, so there's probably a lot of wrongness I'm not catching.

I don't know much, so doubt that is true. But do you know what Chou Farci is without googling?Ā 

Posted (edited)

Here's what's wrong with Sietsema.

He's writing about a dinner at an Italian restaurant.

Quote

We . . . asked that the meal be sent out in three courses — apps, pastas, and a single shared main course — and the staff readily complied. (Often despite my request, the second and third courses appear at the same time.)

Yeah.Ā  Cuz you go to shit restaurants.

Edited by Sneakeater
Posted
On 11/13/2023 at 11:22 PM, Sneakeater said:

I think Pete Wells gets it right, mostly.

Meaning, again, not that I agree with him, but that he makes sense and sounds like he knows what he's talking about (about a broad range, too).

Yes indeed. Remember the roller coaster of Frank Bruni?

Posted
41 minutes ago, Wilfrid said:

Yes indeed. Remember the roller coaster of Frank Bruni?

I'm not convinced Pete Wells is a huge improvement, but tbh, I stopped reading restaurant reviews because I rarely agree and most are convinced their opinion is more important than the work they are assessing.Ā 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...